Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorمحمد رفاعي محمد أمين-
dc.description.abstractSome Divine attributions expressed in the holy Quran and Sunnah in anthropomorphic and anthropopathic way that couldn't be accepted by its literal meanings; such as God has eye, hand, leg, is moved to anger, satisfaction, wonder: joy, laugh and other attributions similar to human beingb. It was called "sifath al-khabariyyah" by Muslim theologians. Muslim Scholars and theologians divided into groups according to their approach to these anthropomorphic Divine attributions, some of them were literalists and anthropomorphic said nothing can be compared to God in his divinity but, in Form, He is like human beings. Others were rationalist who gave metaphoric interpretation to sacred text to assure the purity and dignity of the Islamic concept of God, they are known as Khalaf as well. And some others accepted those attributions (without how/Bila kayfa) since their true meanings are beyond our understanding/Metaphysics, they have been called SalaJ: This article discusses the opinion of Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi, one of the eminent Muslim scholars, and his contribution to this philosophical issue.en_US
dc.subjectMuhyiddin Ibn Arabien_US
dc.subjectAnthropomorphic and anthropopathic wayen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophical issueen_US
dc.titleمنهج محي الدين بن عربي في فهم المتشابهات رؤية تحليلية من خلال نصوصةen_US
dc.title.alternativeManhaj Muhy al-Din Bin 'Arabi fi fahm al-mutashabihat ru'yat tahliliyah min khilal nususah-
Appears in Collections:'Ulum Islamiyyah, Vol. 6,2011

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
'Ulum Islamiyyah - Vol.6 2011 (9th part).pdf4.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.