Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ddms.usim.edu.my:80/jspui/handle/123456789/8463
Title: Validation of Electrical Impedance Tomography Qualitative and Quantitative Values and Comparison of the Numeric Pain Distress Score against Mammography
Authors: Norsham, Juliana,
Suzana, Shahar,
Kanaga Kumari, Chelliah,
Ahmad Rohi, Ghazali,
Fazilah, Osman,
Mohd Azmani, Sahar,
Keywords: Breast screening
EIT
validation
pain score
mammography
comparison
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention
Abstract: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a potential supplement for mammogram screening. This study aimed to evaluate and feasibility of EIT as opposed to mammography and to determine pain perception with both imaging methods. Women undergoing screening mammography at the Radiology Department of National University of Malaysia Medical Centre were randomly selected for EIT imaging. All women were requested to give a pain score after each imaging session. Two independent raters were chosen to define the image findings of EIT. A total of 164 women in the age range from 40 to 65-year-old participated and were divided into two groups; normal and abnormal. EIT sensitivity and specificity for rater 1 were 69.4% and 63.3, whereas for rater 2 they were 55.3% and 57.0% respectively. The reliability for each rater ranged between good to very good (p < 0.05). Quantitative values of EIT showed there were significant differences in all values between groups (ANCOVA, p < 0.05). Interestingly, EIT scored a median pain score of 1.51 +/- 0.75 whereas mammography scored 4.15 +/- 0.87 ( Mann Whitney U test, p < 0.05). From these quantitative values, EIT has the potential as a health discriminating index. Its ability to replace image findings from mammography needs further investigation.
URI: http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8463
ISSN: 1513-7368
Appears in Collections:Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Validation of electrical impedance tomography qualitative and quantitative.pdf183.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.